
Trevor Purvis
51.363
Week 2 - Introduction/History of the Discipline
Week 3 - Sources of International Law
Week 4 - Subjects of International Law
Week 5 - International Law on War and Warfare
Week 6 - Jurisdiction
Week 7 - State & Diplomatic Immunities
Week 8 - Recognition and Nationality
Week 9 - State Responsibility
Week 10 -
State Succession
Week 11 - Law
of Treaties
Week 12 - Law
of the Sea
Week 11 - Law of
Treaties
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)
90
parties, 47 signatures, CIF 1988
largely reflects customary law majority
of provisions therefore binding on most parties
Essential Elements: 2(1)(a)
agreement between states
&/or other subjects with treaty making capacity
intention to create
legally binding obligations
for purposes of Convention agreement must be
written oral is OK if customary
agreement governed by IL not
ML
states can unilaterally bind themselves in absence of treaty
Principal Stages in Treaty Making
adoption of text by the parties: 9
authentication
of original text (signature): 10
consent of states to binding effect
(ratification, accession): 11-16
coming into force, usually at
predetermined date or number of ratifications: 24
twilight period, in which
parties cannot then defeat object or purpose of treaty: 18
registration
with UN Secretariat: 80 (plus Charter 102)
Reservations
Reservations legally exclude or modify
legal effect of certain provisions in treaty in their application to reserving
state: 2(1)(d).
State acceding to treaty may formulate a reservation
unless:
reservation not permitted by treaty: 19(a)-(b)
reservation
incompatible with object & purpose of treaty: 19(c)
Some reservations require no acceptance, or acceptance by all other parties, depending on nature & terms of the treaty: 20(1)-(3).
Otherwise, acceptance of a reservation constitutes the reserving state party to the treaty effect of reservation becomes reciprocal: 20(4)(a), 21(1).
Conversely, an objection to a reservation may prevent treaty in its entirety, or simply provisions to which reservation relates from coming into force between objecting & reserving states, depending on expressed intention of objecting state & intent of treaty: 20(4)(b), 21(3).
Effect of reservations, acceptance or objections to reservations must be determined bilaterally.
Reservations to the Convention on Genocide Case (ICJ,
1951) compatibility test:
balance universality with consent
reserving state is party to a Convention even if some parties reject the
reservation, as long as the reservation is still compatible with the object
& purpose of the Convention
if B considers reservation to be
incompatible to object & purpose, then B may consider reserving state not to
be a party
if C accepts compatibility of reservation, reserving state is
considered a party
if a signatory who has not yet ratified the Convention
objects to the reservation, it can give its notice of opinion & after
ratification will have same legal effect as above provisional objection will
crystallise
an objection to a reservation made by a state that is entitled
to accede or sign but has not yet done so is without legal effect
VCLT attempts to preserve relationship between reserving & objecting state: 19-21.
Legal Effects of Treaties
Pacta Sunt Servanda:
jus cogens
binding
treaties must be performed in good faith: 26
states cannot be excused of
non-performance because of domestic legal impediments: 27
if implementation
is not achieved, state will have to make reparations: 46
Non-Retroactivity:
unless clearly established
otherwise, rights & obligations are not retroactive: 28
Territorial Application:
unless clearly established
otherwise, treaties apply equally to entire territory of state party:
29
Implied Abrogation:
in cases of incompatibility
between old & new treaty rights & obligations, new treaty prevails
between state parties to new treaty: 30
Effect on 3rd Parties:
treaties create neither
rights nor obligations for non-party states without their consent: 34
if
party wants to accept rights & obligations, it must be written: 35
if
treaty confers right on 3rd party & 3rd party acts upon it, consent can be
established
Treaty Interpretation
treaty provisions to be interpreted according to their
"ordinary meaning": 31(1) (custom)
this does not necessarily mean literal
meaning
Qualifications:
"in good faith": 31(1)
"in
their context": 31(2)-(3)
Context includes:
preamble and annexes
agreements between all parties in connection with conclusion of treaty
instruments made by parties in connection with, and accepted by parties, in
conclusion of treaty
"in light of object & purpose" (preamble, prior
agreements, subsequent practice): 31(1)
unless "special meaning
intended": 31(4)
"supplementary means of interpretation" in case of
ambiguity i.e. preparatory work (after using above): 32
General Principles Applied to Treaty Interpretation:
contemporaneity give terms legal/factual meaning they would have had at time
of conclusion of treaty
unless subsequent events force change in meaning
of treaty terms
use liberal purposive interpretation for treaties
establishing IGOs
ICJ strict construction of treaties derogating from
state sovereignty (unclear practice)
interpret multilingual treaties so as
to reconcile different language versions if impossible, use original language
text: 33(4)
Invalidation of Treaties
grounds available to invalidate treaties are highly
circumscribed
treaties presumed to be valid until shown (by party seeking
to invalidate) to be invalid.
Violation of Internal Law:
manifest violation of
internal law with regards to competence to conclude treatiesviolation must be
apparent & of fundamental importance: 46
contrast with 27
voidable
at option of aggrieved party
Excess of Authority:
excess of representative's
authority in expressing state consent to be bound: 47
restrictions on
authority must be brought to other party's attention
other party is
entitled to rely on authority
voidable at option of aggrieved
party
Error of Fact:
treaty may be voidable if error of
fact which essential basis for consent: 48
not voidable if change of fact
is the responsibility of party seeking to void treaty
party must reasonably
ascertain the truth
what is "essential" is unsettled (perhaps object &
purpose)
voidable at option of aggrieved party
Fraud:
fraud by another negotiating state inducing
consent: 49
voidable at option of aggrieved party
Bribery:
bribery/corruption of state representative
to give consent: 50
voidable at option of aggrieved party
Treaty Implementation (Four Modes) :
1. incorporate /
adopt the text of the treaty into domestic statute as a whole
2. take the
substance, not the wording of a treaty and put into domestic statute
3.
implementing statute which is subject to the treaty
4. implementing by
administrative action (i.e. peace treaties, defence pacts)
Treaty Making Power
Treating making power rests on:
principles
international law
constitutions of federal states
Canadian
Constitution
provinces cannot enter into treaties